[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Athlon 1.2Ghz results == P4 1.5

To: R Clint Whaley <rwhaley@cs.utk.edu>
Subject: Re: Athlon 1.2Ghz results == P4 1.5
From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@aracnet.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:55:23 -0800 (PST)
cc: <atlas-comm@cs.utk.edu>, <math-atlas-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>, <atlas@cs.utk.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200111282003.PAA05434@enterprise.cs.utk.edu>

On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, R Clint Whaley wrote:

> Guys,
>
> I am impressed.  Of course, the P4 cleans up the place in single,
> since it is using SSE for double the theoretical peak . . .

What are the *numerical* tradeoffs between SSE and 3DNOW2?? :))
--
znmeb@aracnet.com (M. Edward Borasky) http://www.meta-trading-coach.com
Relax! Run Your Own Brain with Neuro-Semantics!

Americans for Gnu Control remind you: "No gnus is good news!"

References:
- Athlon 1.2Ghz results == P4 1.5
  - From: R Clint Whaley <rwhaley@cs.utk.edu>

Prev by Date: =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?W7GksO1dILzux8649MDatb+xuMPgx8G3zrHXt6XA1LTPtNkh?=
Next by Date: Re: Athlon 1.2Ghz results == P4 1.5
Prev by thread: Athlon 1.2Ghz results == P4 1.5
Next by thread: Re: Athlon 1.2Ghz results == P4 1.5
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread